In recent months, it’s been difficult to turn on a television or read the newspaper without hearing from different interest groups weighing in on the controversy surrounding the Cordoba House, a Muslim community center being built near Ground Zero in New York City. Misinformation has run amok, from rumors that the community center is being built on Ground Zero (it isn’t) to news reports stating it will open on the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks (it won’t).
The Cordoba House is scheduled to be built a full two blocks away from Ground Zero; it won’t even be within sight of where the World Trade Center once stood. Yet many Americans, Republican and Democrat, are furious.
The mass opposition to the Cordoba House brings to light a growing anti-Muslim sentiment that has spread in America since 9/11. Many Americans still feel that the entire Muslim religion is to blame. People need to recognize the attack on the World Trade Center was the work of Muslim extremists, and in no way represents the feelings and beliefs of the majority of those who follow Islam.
Ironically, the entire point of the Cordoba House is to increase American understanding of the Muslim faith, and to promote general religious acceptance between different faiths. Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the leader of the proposed community center, has said that the Cordoba House will help show the world that Muslim extremists represent a minority of Muslims. Rauf heads an organization called the Cordoba Initiative, the goal of which is to improve relations between the Muslim Community and the West. According to Rauf, most Muslims are moderate practitioners of the faith and condemn the terrorist actions of Islam’s few extremist followers.
Despite this, many Americans see the “Ground Zero Mosque” as an insult to the victims of 9/11. Some of the strongest opposition to the Cordoba House has been from the Christian Evangelical voter base. Christian leader Pat Robertson has filed a lawsuit against the New York City planning committee for allowing the mosque to be built. Robertson has said in the past that Islam is not a religion but a political machine bent on world domination, and to allow Muslims to practice freely in America could have dangerous consequences. This is an interesting stance to take, considering the fact that our founding fathers seemed to have only praise for Islam. Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were both strong advocates for religious freedom that included Christians, Jews, Pagans, and Muslims. Benjamin Rush, a co-signer of the Constitution, even suggested that the morals of Islam were superior to those of Christianity.
Former President George W. Bush gave his views on Islam immediately prior to the 9/11 attacks at a Islamic Center in Washington D.C.
“The face of terror is not the true face of Islam … That’s not what Islam is about. Islam is peace.”
It really isn’t hard to understand where the opponents of the Cordoba House are coming from. On Sept. 11, 2001, two planes being piloted by Muslim extremists showed America that we are indeed vulnerable. We needed someone to blame, and Islam seemed to be the obvious scapegoat.
The Cordoba House is an attempt by Muslim leaders to heal the damage done to the reputation of Islam in America. It will help foster understanding between all categories of belief and will do honor to the memory of those who perished on 9/11.
What America needs to do now is forgive. Several extremists operating on the radical fringe of a peaceful religion have made us forsake the values that we hold so dear.
A gem of advice was offered once by a well known (but sometimes overlooked) prophet from Nazareth.
“Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.”
Ryan • Sep 7, 2010 at 12:13 pm
One nation under God was added in the 1950’s and the Pledge which should be changed is not a basis on which to build a nation or a school of thought.
Bobby • Sep 1, 2010 at 1:01 am
“One nation under GOD” is in the pledge of allegiance not “one nation under whoever you want to worship”… and if you didn’t know in history when Muslims concord new territory they would tear down important buildings and would build a mosque in its place as a sign of victory and i feel that this is what its signifying. Maybe the Muslim community in New York don’t have these intentions but it its essentially its a scaled down reenactment of this horrible practice. In in the Muslim culture if you don’t agree with some of there ideologies, religion, or way of life then your considered an infidel…
Austen Edwards • Aug 31, 2010 at 12:23 pm
I don’t understand why people care about this! Who cares where a mosque is built. This is America. A country founded on freedom. Its in the damn Bill of Rights to put a worship place where ever you want. Why does this get more press about the REAL issues in America. We pride our selves on being so free and great, but really you can only practice your freedom if the majority of Americans agree with it. If Muslims wanted to start a I hate America club right next door to ground zero, they have the right to do so. A handfull of people were supposedly responsible for 9/11, not all muslims. And ditto of what Ryan says, many terrorists attacks have been carried out by WHITE CHRISTIANS on America itself, and I’ve never heard an uproar about putting churches by those places. You people seriously need to devote your energy to bettering this country not segregating it.
Didaskalos • Aug 31, 2010 at 10:56 am
Funny thing about that sometimes-overlooked prophet from Nazareth: in the same chapter of Matthew in which he made the anti-judging imperative, he made a pro-judging command that probably wouldn’t win any political correctness points: “Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not cast your pearls before swine.”
Jesus also made (in John’s gospel) another pro-judging exhortation that probably applies more to the Ground Zero mosque contretemps: “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” The imam has the unquestionable legal right to build the mosque. If he were truly seeking bridge-building opportunities, he’d follow the example of the Carmelite nuns, who at the request of Pope John Paul II moved out of a convent they’d established at Auschwitz for the purpose of praying for the souls of the departed.
Larry Tizer • Aug 29, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Most of you on here save for ryan and bob are ignorant f@cks. If you would actually read the Quran you would see that Islam is just as peaceful religion as Christianity, Buddhism, etc. Its certain people and sects of religions like Islam that give it the bad reputation of being all terrorists.
steven-forbes@sbcglobal.net • Aug 29, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Get your head out of the sand there Jim, and I would like to ditto what NIK, TAZZ, and MSB had to say above. The only thing I would add is that this “Imam” in his own words, said that we were accomplices in the 911 attacks and will not condemn Hamas as a terror network, which by definition clearly is. Not to mention that this $100 million plus is going to be funded entirely by the Middle East, i.e. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, et. al.
Ryan • Aug 29, 2010 at 1:37 pm
Saying, or implying, that all Muslims are terrorists is like saying all Christians are ignorant backwoods pig f@ckers some may be but to say all are is itself stupid and ignorant. By the way not all terrorists are Muslims just look at The Army of God, Environmental extremists, Scott Roeder, KKK, Aryan Nations, Eric Robert Rudolph, Timothy Mcveigh, The Unabomber, and many more. Tazz should take his advice and actually read the Qu’ran wich contains just as many passages of peace just like a lot of religious texts it contains messages of peace as well as those against.
Larry Linn • Aug 27, 2010 at 7:22 pm
My grandparents were Christians in Northern Ireland. She was Protestant, and he was Catholic. They had to flee after death threats.
I volunteered and joined the Army, and I served as an 11B Infantryman. Most of my time in the field was in squad or platoon size operations. We would have discussions about what we were fighting for. It always came back to the “Bill of Rights”. To me the most important was “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
What did our Founding Fathers have to say about religion:
MSB • Aug 27, 2010 at 3:56 pm
Not all Muslims are terrorist, but it seems all terrorist are Muslims…
Tazz • Aug 27, 2010 at 2:26 pm
If is Islam is peace maybe you should read the Qu’ran, Islam isn’t peace : Dar al Harb that’s the West (war zone) Dar al Islam (Islam zone of Peace) Islam is peace between muslims, not with other believers. Maybe you should read the Surate too. Islam is an ideology not a religion.
all terrorist attacks in the word come from them. I say I’m not a racist, I respect other beliefs but not that one. Thanks
Stoning or lapidations is that peace? Sharia is that peace? Let’s stop the bullshit it’s not about peace
Nik • Aug 27, 2010 at 1:01 pm
Move the Mosque, it is disrespectful. Regardless extreme or moderate, their beliefs have the same foundation and preach as you may but please educate yourself. Most Muslims view westerners as infidels. Not to mention that if you look at the world and the areas in the world where violence is prominent, look at who is behind the violence in Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Russia…
Bob • Aug 26, 2010 at 10:04 pm
Great article!