Last week, NPR news analyst and respected civil rights writer Juan Williams was fired for remarks he made on “The O’Reilly Factor.” Since then, the controversy over his firing has been discussed by news media relentlessly. It has ushered in a discussion about everything from whether NPR should continue its federal funding, whether Williams was out of line and whether this is an issue of free speech. What many are disregarding is the question Williams seemed like he was about to raise before he was interrupted by Bill O’Reilly on the show.

The often-quoted excerpt from Williams’ Oct. 18 appearance on “The O’Reilly Factor” is his remark regarding Muslims on planes: “When I get on a plane, I gotta tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think they’re identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.” For this small quote, Williams, who worked for NPR for over ten years, received a phone call two days later in which he was informed his contract was terminated.
He followed his remarks about Muslims on planes with a mention of the Times Square bomber, who said, according to Williams, that “America’s war with Muslims is just beginning.” Shortly thereafter, he was interrupted by Bill O’Reilly. It seems to me Williams was commenting on the wider issue at hand here in the “War on Terror.” At what point does this become a war of us versus them? Radical Muslims like the Times Square bomber see the war as Islam versus America. In turn, the majority of Americans who are not Muslim sometimes make the mistake of confusing all Muslims as terrorists.
It’s the same situation we saw with the mosque in New York. The arguments primarily against the mosque seemed to be that because the people who flew the planes into the World Trade Center were Muslim, it is offensive to have an Islamic community center near Ground Zero. It didn’t seem to matter to critics of the mosque that the Muslims in New York building the mosque had no connection to al Qaida and instead were just as American as the people speaking out against them. There’s a word for the kind of logic that disregards facts to associate all members of a social, religious or racial group as being exactly the same –– it’s called bigotry.
In May, Williams said on Fox News that he understands “the instinct that says, look, these people are Muslim radicals, why don’t we just call it for what it is? But if you are politically savvy, you want to make sure that people who are simply faithful Muslims don’t think that we’re going after them.” To me, all of this speaks to the wider issues here. If al Qaida is saying that this is a war between Islam and the West, at what point are we buying into that delusion? Clearly, we are at war with al Qaida. When a nation goes to war against an organization, especially one which identifies itself as the true representation of a religion, there’s an inherent danger there that we might begin to see all the adherents of that religion as the enemy. Even Williams, a respected civil rights author who, by all accounts, is not a bigot, sometimes makes this mistake, which is exactly what he was speaking to in his Oct. 18 appearance on “The O’Reilly Factor.”
He was saying that the paranoia that has developed as a result of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent wars in the Middle East has created an uneasiness in some Americans, including Williams, who may be a little nervous when they see a Muslim on a plane.
The problem here comes in when one begins to consider whether or not he had a right to say it. Is it right to point out a deep-seated bigotry that might be hiding in the minds of a lot of Americans, especially on a cable news channel? NPR says no. But I think the wider point Williams was making was a valuable one, something that we should all think about. Otherwise, the terrorists win, because we’ll only be fighting ourselves.
Stephanie Smith • Oct 30, 2010 at 9:56 am
Martin,
The protesters at military funerals are not anti-war they are anti-America accepting all people as they are, most notably homosexuals.
The controversy over the mosque two blocks from ground zero displays that many Americans associate Muslims with terrorists.
That being said, NPR was completely in the right. Juan Williams should have known that going onto any show on Fox News would mean that he would be interrupted and possibly even set up into saying something he doesn’t believe or could be perceived in a bad light. Which is magically what happened.
Juan Williams intent and beliefs are not being questioned. His choice of using a 24 hour news network to display them are.
Subterranian • Oct 29, 2010 at 2:19 pm
Totally agree with Martin, particularly in that Muslim community does not seem so eager to denounce terrorist attacks made in the name of Islam. However, they’re very quick and harsh throwing fatwas at any mention of their prophet.
Hobgob • Oct 29, 2010 at 11:40 am
Well they did bar employees from participating in the rally to restore sanity.
Martin • Oct 29, 2010 at 7:41 am
“In turn, the majority of Americans who are not Muslim sometimes make the mistake of confusing all Muslims as terrorists.”
-This is absolutely untrue. Give Americans a little more credit. Many Americans may be more wary of the Nation of Islam than they were ten years ago. President Bush, in a rare moment of eloquence, clearly identified our enemy as not a religion, but as a terrorist organization of “evil doers”. I believe this is the theme of this article. Somehow (?), President Bush said it better in 2001.
This “wariness” of Islam is an unfortunate after effect of extremists in the ranks. I wish the other vast majority of Muslims in the U.S., if not the world, would organize to more vocally denounce those who are not only terrorizing the west, but are oppressing peaceful people in their own communities.
“The problem here comes in when one begins to consider whether or not he had a right to say it.”
-There is no debate as to whether or not this is free speech. If anti-war protestors can parade a fallen solder’s funeral calling service members “fag lovers” and “baby killers”, Mr. Williams can express uneasiness about our ability to separate surreptitious terrorists from peaceful worshipers.
I believe NPR’s position is not whether or not Mr. Williams has a 1st amendment right to free speech, but if said speech violated NPR contract language. A business has the ability to censor employees representing their company, but should NPR, a federally funded program, censor its news, op-ed’s and employees to such a far left bias? One would hope our tax dollars would not fund a soap box for one political party.