I’m a smoker. These days, the guilt carried with saying those words is embarrassing, like admitting to wetting the bed, perhaps, or acknowledging that you used to steal bikes as a child. But I’m a smoker nonetheless.
When I first heard about the Food and Drug Administration’s new proposed changes to cigarette packs, I was appalled. The changes involve covering the top half of cigarette packs with pictures of diseased lungs and corpses. That’s right: pictures of actual corpses.

The proposal comes in the wake of Michigan becoming the 37th state of the union last May to ban smoking in almost all public places, and with all the recent tax hikes on cigarettes. It seems clear that lawmakers in the state and in the country want us all to quit.
I argued with more than a few of my non-smoking friends in heated debate over the regulations. I said it was sick. I said that it was cowardly –– if the FDA really cared about getting people to quit smoking, wouldn’t they ban tobacco altogether, like the recent Four Loko ban in Michigan that is supposedly for the public health? The FDA certainly has the power.
A friend asked me if I was too bull-headed to admit that the new pictures might stop one person, at the very least, from smoking. I conceded that point. Maybe someone, somewhere, will see the picture of a corpse and stop smoking. The debate ended somewhere around there.
A week or so later, I was grocery shopping when I saw a man in the crowd with a throat stoma. A stoma is an artificial opening created by doctors after an injury to an area –– in this case, likely throat cancer.
My hand instantly went to my throat. I pictured myself with a stoma and the idea was distasteful.
I feel guilty for my reaction. That guy was just going grocery shopping; he wasn’t expecting someone like myself to be so shocked by his appearance, but I couldn’t help it. The reality of smoking was right there in front of me. A little voice in my head was saying, “If you keep smoking, this could be you someday.”
I stopped smoking for two days. Then, of course, my addicted body went right back reaching for a pack of smokes.
I think most of us smokers probably started smoking in a bar or at a party, with a drink in our hand. Now, we’re denied even that small pleasure. I was one of the fiercest critics of the ban and now it seems natural even to me.
There are 45 million smokers in the nation. While I still believe everyone certainly has the right to smoke, I have to admit that what we’re doing isn’t great for our bodies. And maybe –– just maybe –– the FDA is finally doing something right.
So, although the FDA regulations sound asinine, in a way, they’re beneficial. If I had to look at a picture of a corpse every time I smoked, I think it would, at the very least, slow down my smoking.
There was a time, back in the days of Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, when smoking was elegant and classy. Now, I’m afraid, we’re a dying breed –– and perhaps with good reason. Maybe all these anti-smoking regulations should be a wake-up call to smokers. And if it stops even one person, I think it might just be worth it.
Jenny • Jun 26, 2012 at 8:40 am
Since changes to cigarette packs were proposed, more and more smoking people try to express their opinions concerning this proposition. However, Food and Drug Administration does its work for the sake of people, but this measure is accepted only by non-smokers.
Jeff • Jan 17, 2011 at 9:29 am
It’s not the goverments job to stop stupidity. Everyone knows that smoking is bad for you and that it kills you. Skydiving is dangerous and could result in death, but people should have the right to do what they want. The government needs to stay out of my life and should not try to make decisions for me. I will smoke or not smoke based on what I want to do, not what the government or others want me to do.
Scott • Dec 4, 2010 at 1:27 pm
The evils of tobacco are clear even to the brave Mr. Belz. Through the vile effects of nicotine addiction he can see the FDA is doing good work. Put the coffin nails away and embrace the future. Try a nicotine patch or gum. Choose life! Reject tobacco assisted suicide!
If only a way could be found to tax comments, then we would be on the way toward utopia.
Martin • Dec 3, 2010 at 8:48 am
John G.- you don’t need graphic photos in McDonalds. Just walk in! The live show is much more unappetizing than posters. Why are the people in the commercials never the ones in line at the restaurant?
Oh, tax on candy and soda? Already there. Trans fat too. California leads the Progressive way!
pat • Dec 2, 2010 at 2:57 pm
Shall we all drive 5 mph if it saves just one life? Smokers don’t look at the pack of cigarettes. They buy the pack, open it , pull one out and smoke it. This idea of nasty pictures was dreamed up as a jr. high health project. ” Hey gang- let’s put nasty pictures on cigarette packs… I bet that will make tham stop”.
John Galt • Dec 2, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Perhaps they should follow the same logic for other “Dangerous” products…like photos of diseased livers or wrecked cars on 50% of a beer can, or photos of hugely obese people or diseased hearts on 50% of McDonald’s wrappers…afterall, if it stops just one person…
The government will never ban tobacco because they profit from it. Next in line – taxes on sodas and candy bars, if only they could find a way to make THOSE addictive too.