I was 18 years old when it came time to vote for Bush’s successor to the throne, so I could’ve voted. I followed the election media frenzy. Still, I did not vote because I had the notion that no matter who won, the U.S. corporate state of war would continue. I didn’t want to give any of that my vote of approval.
By corporate state of war, I’ve defined three categories: Corporate meaning national economics, the money trail of power in America. State refers to the functions of government that include surveillance and secrecy. War is the insane aggression the U.S. perpetuates around the globe to both humans and animals.
Recently, my predictions were affirmed by a simple website called “WhatInTheF***HasObamaD oneSoFar.com.” What the man on the iconic poster promising hope has done in the most powerful office in history is no different from his idiot predecessor. The system is destructive, flawed and corrupt. The information following is on the site.
The bailout of the organized gangsters on Wall Street revealed Obama’s intention to continue acting as an enabler to the criminal partners. The function of plutocrats is to run a government, enter the swinging door: politicians and executives switch roles when convenient. Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, was living in a JPMorgan-Chase executive’s house rent free while the bailout progressed. The Monsanto public policy director works for the FDA. The appointees have histories with and interests for companies that will look after them later.
During the Bush years, the independent media sources on the left were in awe of what the executive branch pushed through as Homeland Security. The Patriot Act is another move to intimidate dissidents through FBI investigations and accusations of terrorism when protest is direct. But groups like the Rainforest Action Network and local peace collectives are being monitored by the FBI under the current administration. Obama came into office promising change, but if any change has come at all it’s for the worse in regards to transparency under the Freedom of Information Act. The Obama administration has cited more exemptions to inquiries than Bush and his buddies. They’re cracking down and keeping quiet.
Finally, no organized crime is without violence. For the current executive branch of the U.S., the list is long. 150 other countries have signed a land mine ban because of their tendency to harm civilians in war zones, but not Team Obama. The trigger-happy mercenaries of Blackwater still receive a check from Washington and remote controlled airplanes drop bombs in “self-defense,” while a report says that one in three killed by these predator drones are civilians. With regards to the war against the earth, Obama continues the Bush tradition of limiting the power of the Endangered Species Act and Environmental Protection Agency so as to not to curb pollution from industries. In alternative energies, Obama loaned over eight billion to build two radiated power plants. There is nothing sustainable about uranium mining, toxic waste and the threat of nuclear disaster. Everything is still ridiculous.
There’s more, but mainly the government dines with the capitalists while the populous and planet front the bill.
In talks with my family, we came to an understanding that they would vote for president and I wouldn’t. I recalled a slogan that read, “If it’s humiliating to be ruled, how much more humiliating to choose the ruler.” That satisfied my romantic notions to resist the vote, but the news on what still goes on sustained my other reason: Obama won’t change much to make the U.S. more just, peaceful, or sustainable. Obama can’t change things because their inherent in the system. As a global empire, the U.S. will uphold a powerful structure of government by any means necessary.
I regret not voting in the recent Michigan election. That is closer to where change will sprout from. Not the state government, but local involvement in sustainable and peaceful living choices. As for changing the empire we live in, Gandhi may suggest being the change I want to see, but I can’t be the change of the use of predator drones or industrial pollution which is frustrating, but knowledgeable communities with honest representatives could pass legislation to stop these things. That’s unlikely, and that is why I am an anti-authoritarian, or more commonly known as an anarchist. Now time to drop out, tune in and smash the industrial state.

























Stephanie • Dec 9, 2010 at 6:55 pm
I like how the comments seem to be better thought out than the article that was published.
wtfhasobamadonesofar.com does not support anything the author wrote showing he didn’t even look at his source before listing it.
Elisabeth • Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 pm
If you don’t vote, don’t bitch.
Rafiji • Dec 3, 2010 at 11:48 am
I love the anarchists. You see them at world trade organization meetings trashing neighborhoods in the name of social and economic justice. Truthfully, they are just a bunch of spoiled middle class brats who like to wreck other peoples property then smoke dope and congratulate each other.
I also like those who hate the industrial state. Funny statement from the author who is writing this op-ed on his PC, probably while texting on his smart phone, then he jumps in his car, drive to his apartment, flips on his TV then fires up his Wii fo a few hours of gamin’. Yeah, all products of the industrial state that he mindlessly hates so much. Guess he’d be happier living in a mud hut and foraging for food.
Martin • Dec 3, 2010 at 8:42 am
Jacob- Don’t encourage him! Some people don’t vote, and that’s o.k. Sometimes its for the best that certain people voluntarily pass on their right to contrubute to important decisions.
Jacob C. • Dec 2, 2010 at 4:10 pm
So lets get this straight: you don’t vote/didn’t vote at least in the presidential election. Justify your non-voting by a random slogan. Use a satirical website to ground your opinions about a government that you refuse to participate in with your basic civic duty, compare the previous eight year presidency to-two years of the current presidency. Proclaim that not even Ghandi would raise a voice against these actions of a government.
So you’ve lost hope, or you just feel too cynical to have ever tried and care.
You state you’re an anarchist so that you can feel as if you live outside the society and feel okay about just giving up, (although I’m sure you still pay taxes, buy FDA regulated food and drugs, drive on NHTSA approved highways, and drive or ride in FMVSS approved cars, etc, etc.) “Ignorance is bliss” might have been a better ending to your opinion piece than paraphrasing Timothy Leary.
Your opinion hurts me as someone who is 25 years old and has voted every chance I’ve had.
Your opinion and many others who feel the same in our age group, who also choose not to vote, our why you feel you have to control or in anything to do with the government. The largest voting group is 65 and up. A demographic which grows every year currently, but Ghandi would not have given up on the system and neither should you or anyone. You can make a difference but you need to have the drive, passion and patience to make it happen a little hope never hurts either. If you fail, you just have to revise and try again, that is the change you should see yourself to be. It may not be perfect system now, but the great thing about the U.S. is that we can change that.