As human beings, we need a couple of things to continue living on this giant home of ours.
We’ve all learned this in elementary school, but I’ll do a quick recap: we die without water, we’re exposed to the elements without shelter and we starve (or eventually grow sick) without (nutritious) food.
While I feel this is fairly universal knowledge, I continue to be sorely mistaken.
It seems that, despite having the grade-school knowledge of what we need to stay alive, humans continue to exploit the very things that entails and at the expense of fragile and finite local environments.
We continue to dig for gold and oil and any number of what we consider precious minerals. We use unethical human labor to make our clothes, electronics and most of our diets possible.
This is our current societal paradigm, one of unsustainable practices for the benefit of few and the promise of economic gain for many, and it’s frankly not going to last much longer at the rate we’re going.
In an article published earlier this week, New York Times writer Suzanne Daley examined a town in northeast Greece that is, along with the rest of the country, facing its sixth year of dire economic recession. This town, however, is built on gold—gold that Alexander the Great himself once mined for.
If you’re a cynic like me, you can probably imagine the rest of the story: a mining company, which does not hail from Greece, nor even Europe, but Canada, is taking the reigns on a mining operation in the seaside town of Lerissos, where they expect to create 1,500 short-term jobs that will provide perhaps 10 years of employment.
This, of course, is at the expense of the prototypical Greek livelihood—olive trees, honey bees, plants that thrive only in a Mediterranean environment—which will all be subjected, along with the inhabitants of northern Greece, to the dust of the mining operations in the region.
But the narrative of economic gain over sustainability and humanity is not limited to the shores of Greece and the sweatshops of Bangladesh.
Marquette County residents have recently been characters in a very similar account.
Up until the beginning of January, when the permits necessary for the construction of County Road 595 were not filed by the Environmental Protection Agency, we too were facing the seemingly inevitable threat of corporate interests trumping environmental protection.
The road, which would have been funded entirely by corporate mining giant Rio Tinto, would have created a 21-mile stretch of pavement from Rio Tinto’s Eagle mine in the Yellow Dog Plains, southwest of Big Bay, to the Humboldt Mill in Ishpeming.
The proposed roadway would have intersected forested wetlands in some of the most untouched—and fragile—wilderness in the Upper Peninsula and, arguably, the United States.
While alternative routes for hauling nickel and copper from the mine to the mill have been present from the beginning, the proposed roadway was still alarmingly close to becoming a reality.
I do, however, understand the supposed benefits of such practices as mining and such rationale as economy over environment.
It can be argued that the sacrifices we make environmentally are in the best interests of the working class, the families that rely on mining and similar operations to put food on the table. I can’t argue with that. I also know that my own lifestyle as a middle-class college student who owns a laptop and drives a car requires mining to a certain extent.
However, at some point humans (including myself) have to realize that these lifestyles are not compatible with the finite resources we have to work with.
We must work toward a future of localization, of longer lasting products, of decreased consumption and consumerism.
The promise of 10, 20 or 2,000 jobs is certainly going to provide sustenance to families in the Upper Peninsula and Greece and any number of other places, but at what cost?
The yellow-stained water in Greece, a result of the gold mine runoff, is a consequence they now have to work to mitigate.
This enormous lake on which we live, the largest body of freshwater in a world where thousands of people die daily with no access to clean water, is a resource that we continually have to fight to keep unpoisoned in an era of hydraulic fracturing, mine runoff and little to no care on behalf of the corporations that are responsible for this degradation.
This planet has only so many resources, and the outdated ideology that we should be allowed to degrade the environment for the economic benefit of few needs to be addressed.
Only we, as individuals, can help to change this paradigm. Small but consistent steps are still steps, whether it’s walking to class a couple days of the week instead of driving, shopping locally when possible or simply becoming more informed of the environmental issues in our area and the world.
The earth’s well-being is dependant on all of us—but we need to begin respecting it, and each other, first.
illinois thornton digital photography • Feb 16, 2013 at 12:02 am
Highly energetic post, I liked that a lot. Will there be a part
2?
Kelle • Feb 15, 2013 at 2:11 am
I think teenagers like this look anyways so not to worry.
If the real root cause of being overweight is not addressed, the weight usually
comes back. Wholesale fashion clothing has taken
care of immediately their incorrect inquiry.
Big Bob • Jan 28, 2013 at 3:03 pm
Quit eating cheese Dan. Home town boy makes good and gets hired by Rio Tinto. BS
Daniel Blondeau • Jan 27, 2013 at 10:39 pm
Ms. Monthei,
I am a Marquette native, NMU graduate and employee of Rio Tinto.
After reading your column I felt there were a few details that need to be clarified.
– The EPA was not responsible for issuing a permit for CR 595. The EPA’s refusal to remove objections to the project prevented the MDEQ from issuing a permit for construction of CR 595.
– The Humboldt Mill is located in Humboldt Township, not Ishpeming.
– A majority of the proposed CR 595 is already a road in some fashion. A majority of the proposed route is either pavement, gravel, dirt, two track, etc.
– Eagle Mine currently employs over 80 employees and hundreds of contractors. During production the project will employ 235+ people and have a local hire goal of 75 percent. My employment with Rio Tinto supports my family and I am proud to be working for the company. If I didn’t believe in the company and my co-workers I wouldn’t be commenting here today.
– Safety of our people and the environment is priority one. I see this day in and day out and I encourage others to tour the mine and see it for themselves.
If you are interested in visiting the mine and or the mill please contact me. I would be happy to show you what we’re building at Eagle.
Thank you,
Daniel Blondeau, NMU ’04
Funkenstone • Jan 27, 2013 at 9:00 pm
I implore you to read the essay “I Pencil.” It is easily found on the Internet. If you are unable to comprehend it’s significance, I apologize for what the previous twelve years of government funded indoctrination have done to you.
Catherine Parker • Jan 26, 2013 at 10:40 am
I wonder who Max is, since he doesn’t leave his last name? And I wonder why he doesn’t have something constructive to say, instead of insulting Mandy and making assumptions about what she does or doesn’t know. Of course she realizes there are trade-offs, and she doesn’t attack the Eagle Mine, here. She even says that her lifestyle is dependent on mining, to a certain extent. She’s right to lament the impacts of our modern lifestyles on this planet. One would have to be dead or asleep not to notice that we’re systematically destroying this beautiful and amazing planet.
Regarding the County Road 595 issue, mining and timber industry jobs are not being lost because this road isn’t being built. Road construction jobs haven’t been eliminated, either, contrary to what one County Commissioner has been saying.
One more point I feel compelled to make, relative to Max’s remarks. Mandy didn’t mention “peak oil” in her column, and it’s true that “we” keep finding more petroleum resources, but to say they are not finite is to think from the selfish perspective of a single lifetime. Additionally, many of these newly-discovered reserves of oil and gas are retrieved at great risk to our supply of clean water, which is our most precious resource, and one we absolutely can’t live without! Before you try to argue this one, please have a look at the Alberta tar sands operations, and read about the boreal forests that are being destroyed.
Mandy is right that we have to change the way we live on this planet–if for no other reason, than for our own survival.
Max • Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46 am
The arrogance and ignorance expressed in this article is stunning. A college student living in the utopian environment of a university with few cares or concerns of consequence dismissing the huge benefits of this mine as trivial. According to the author, 10, 20 or 2000 new jobs allowing UP residents to support their families and build a future are meaningless compared to saving the planet. How Malthusian of her. The heck with people who need jobs, an empty and seldom visited forest is more important. Then the statement about just benefiting just the few? Is she kidding? The mine will benefit many. Please take an economics course before making such statements. The planet’s resources are not nearly as limited as we think. New technology constantly leads to new discoveries. Just consider the massive oil and natural gas reserves found in the US. Obviously, the author has no idea about this. 40 years ago, the fraudulent peak oil and over population theories were promoted. Yet now there is more oil than ever and humans are living better than ever at any time in history due to the green revolution in agriculture and technology. The UP needs more mines, more development and more jobs.