The past six months of my life can be solely characterized by an awful and repetitive menagerie of the same questions —“What are your plans for after graduation?”; “Have you been applying for jobs?”; and “Oh, an English major, what are you going to do with that?”
It seems these questions come up every time I have a conversation with a stranger, a stranger who invariably has a kid in engineering school or is on the fast track to a career in an otherwise well-paying field. And I won’t go into the conversations I have with my parents’ friends, but suffice it to say they’re cynical of my career choices.

Of course, this is a familiar experience for college kids on the cusp of the fabled ‘real-world,’ a scary realm where success is marked by figures on a paycheck and how your 401k looks.
As one of the many college students on the verge of graduation, I think I may be able to provide some commentary on the matter:
At the suggestion of a professor in the English department earlier this week, I checked out a speech by author David Foster Wallace, from when he spoke at the Kenyon University 2005 commencement ceremony.
Wallace’s speech, titled “This is Water,” confronted the prototypical perception of a liberal arts college (such as, for the most part, NMU) as a place that helps students “learn how to think.”
Majors such as English, philosophy and history are examples of liberal arts, while the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) embodies the opposite.
Wallace sparingly argues for a more thorough perception of the liberal arts education, and in doing so brings to light the true goal of getting an education — to be “conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience.”
For me, this means learning for the sake of learning — attending classes and getting involved on campus not because it will only make me more qualified (though this is certainly a motivation in my involvement on campus), but because it’s an opportunity for growth, understanding and meaningful experiences.
It means constantly seeking learning opportunities because they will engage my mind, expand my consciousness, and, maybe, if I’m lucky even make me a better person down the road. This means using my education not only as a means to find a job, but as a means to become more of an individual, which, astoundingly, seems to be the most sought-after requirement of employers for when I actually want to work. I’d rather be seen as a useful, sentient human than a mere tool with a nice resume.
In contrast to this idea of learning for the sake of learning is something I saw on campus earlier this week. There are currently little postcards floating around which address the value of attending graduate school (at NMU), with a couple colorful bars (not sure if they constitute as actual bar graphs or just a prettier way to make big numbers look good) showing the statistics that many Northern students have seen before, such as how one can make exceptionally more money with a master’s degree over a bachelor’s degree or how a household’s net worth is more than $100,000 more when there is a master’s degree involved, all of which assumes students even get a job out of graduate school.
This leaves me wondering, in the context of Wallace’s speech and my own personal experience s and desires to actually, thoroughly learn — is the money really all it’s about?
In other words, is the arbitrary assurance that students will make $15,000 more per year, with only a 3.6 percent chance of being unemployed (down from 4.9 percent if your resume has only a bachelor’s degree on it!) really the sole benefit that graduate school has to offer?
Graduate school is an important step, and a decision that many Northern students are considering, likely with great thought being given to the economic benefits and sacrifices of such a commitment.
But while money and comfort — the epitome of modern student goals in higher education, as cited by English professor Gabriel Brahm in his Professor’s Corner column this week — are important to students receiving an education, perhaps more important and yet less discussed is how essential an education is to living in a democratic society, to being a conscious and disciplined citizen in a world of increasing passivity and senselessness.
As Wallace put it in the conclusion of his Kenyon College commencement speech: “Your education is the job of a lifetime.”
Essentially, a life lived well, and mindfully, goes far beyond what you do following graduation. Even if Aunt Meredith or your dad’s friend from work thinks otherwise.
Funkenstone • Sep 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm
Welcome back, It’s good to have the North Wind again. I really enjoy reading what today’s college students are saying and being taught.
I read your column with interest and I must say I found your choice of the word “menagerie” interesting as being descriptive of the questions you’ve been asked. I’m sure you didn’t mean a collection of animals on display, so I assume you meant a diverse or miscellaneous group, however, the questions you described seemed to all be related to your major and future plans. I wouldn’t characterize those as parts of a diverse group. I was no English major, as I’m sure you will discern from my grammatical errors, so I don’t intend my statement as criticism. Anyway, you have my sympathy. I can’t imagine having any six month period of my life solely characterized as being subjected to an onslaught of awful and repetitive questions!
I also found it interesting you would use an appeal to the authority of an author, probably a liberal arts graduate, to support your argument justifying a liberal arts education.
I certainly won’t argue with your thesis that education for it’s own sake is a worthy endeavor, but insinuating the only way to live life well and mindfully is by obtaining a liberal arts degree, as you did by dismissing the concerns of your “Aunt Meredith or your dad’s friend from work”, and suggesting they disagree with the idea that “a life lived well, and mindfully, goes far beyond what you do following graduation”, requires a significant level of hubris.
My concern is that today’s students are not really learning what it means to think critically.
Here are two anecdotal examples of what some liberal arts professors are saying to college students:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_4v0FAf0_k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QNzh06htO4
I’m hopeful this isn’t occurring at NMU, but I am concerned this is how many of today’s students are being taught to deal with opinions different from their own. If it really is commonplace, and this is what’s being taught as critical thinking in liberal arts colleges today, your generation is in serious trouble.
Anyway, welcome back. Enjoy the rest of your college experience and I look forward to reading the North Wind again.
Gabriel Brahm • Sep 5, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Great DFW reference. Great piece, well said.
Richard Andersons • Sep 5, 2013 at 11:06 am
I am an NMU graduate (Class of 2010), and my degree was English Writing. For all four years of my schooling, I had those conversations with friends and family about where my degree would get me and how I expected to achieve anything financially without getting a degree that was more technical and less liberal arts.
What I told them then, and what I’m able to show them today: It’s not money that will bring me comfort (although it is nice to have the ‘stability’ when you can). I didn’t want to become a slave to money. My career was going to be more than just something that paid my way through life and ensured I would die comfortably.
I want and live a life of “once-in-a-lifetime” experiences, of learning, of creating, of dreaming, and being able to see the world in a multitude of perspectives. Going to NMU, getting involved on campus, and the classes my degree required me to take, allowed me to enter the working and “adult” world as primed and able to do that as possible. I’ve been able to live in several different places, visit different countries and worlds, and the motivation to do so came from the experiences I had as a liberal arts student.
Well written article. Some times, it’s easy to wonder what I “should have” majored in. Your article reminded me of what I should be thankful for, and how awesome this “job of a lifetime” has been so far.