Since Michigan’s indoor smoking ban was implemented last year, smokers have increasingly turned to electronic cigarettes to get their nicotine buzz indoors. While electronic cigarettes are allowed in most bars and restaurants, NMU currently has no policy either way on the cigarette substitute.
Electronic cigarettes are shaped like regular cigarettes and consist of a small rechargeable heating unit and a dose of liquid nicotine. The nicotine is heated into a vapor and then inhaled by the smoker, simulating a real cigarette, but without tobacco.
The product is marketed as emitting no harmful secondhand smoke, but questions have been raised as to whether electronic cigarettes are safe for consumption. In September of 2010, the FDA issued warning letters to five distributors of electronic cigarettes for “unsubstantiated claims and poor manufacturing practices.”
FDA regulations are important in determining whether or not a product is safe, said Sarah Derwin, a health educator at the Marquette County Health Department.
“Everybody in the health field is taking a stand back from electronic cigarettes because they are not regulated by the FDA,” Derwin said.
Derwin said that one of the misconceptions about electronic cigarettes is that they should be used as a method to quit smoking. Because they recreate the smoking experience, it could be difficult for smokers to break their addiction, she said.
“One of my concerns is that it looks like a cigarette and feels like a cigarette. It could be easy to relapse and start smoking again,” Derwin said.
While there appears to be no harmful secondhand smoke emitted by electronic cigarettes, more information needs to be presented before the product can be deemed safe for use, Derwin said.
“If someone asked me if it was safe, I would have to say no. There’s just not enough information yet,” she said.
NMU is still undecided on whether or not to allow electronic cigarettes to be used in university buildings, said Jeff Korpi, the assistant director of housing and residence life. There is currently no precedent to look back on to decide either way, he said. The student code restricts tobacco use in university-owned buildings, but nothing is included in the student code about nicotine products.
“We’re surveying peer institutions to see what’s been done. We’re also talking to the president’s round table to get their input,” Korpi said.
Lee Laforge, the manager of Book World in Marquette, is one of the local distributors of electronic cigarettes. The product is marketed as emitting no harmful secondhand smoke, and while the appearance of someone smoking indoors may turn some heads, he has never heard of someone being told they couldn’t smoke one indoors.
“When I flew to Ireland, I was allowed to use it on the plane, as long as I didn’t puff too hard and blow out a lot of vapor,” Laforge said.
Book World, which includes a section in the store that sells tobacco products, was one of the first places in the area to offer electronic cigarettes. The store is based in Appleton, Wisc., another smoke-free state, and has been offering them for almost two years. Laforge, who has successfully quit smoking for over five months, stresses that electronic cigarettes should be used as a nicotine substitute, and not as a quit smoking aid.
“That was the worry, that people would think electronic cigarettes are a way to quit smoking. For a true smoker, (holding a cigarette) is addicting,” Laforge said.
Laforge, also an adjunct teacher at NMU, recommends that anyone truly interested in dropping the habit of smoking contact the health promotions department. However, for anyone simply looking for a healthier way to get nicotine, electronic cigarettes may be the answer, he said. Laforge has seen parents come into the store and buy electronic cigarettes for their kids as a way to steer them away from the harmful chemicals in cigarettes.
“It’s not a healthy solution, but it is healthier (than cigarettes). With an electronic cigarette you are inhaling chemicals, but compared to a cigarette with over 500 chemicals, it’s different,” Laforge said.
Drug Interactions • Oct 31, 2012 at 3:11 am
I really love your writing form.
Treece • Feb 18, 2011 at 3:57 pm
There have been at least 15 reports/analyses on e-cigarettes to date, so Derwin is either alarmingly uninformed or she’s being disingenuous (either way, a concern in her position) when she says there isn’t enough information about e-cigarettes. In fact, far more is known about e-cigarettes than is known about their traditional counterparts. E-cigarettes are actually quite simple devices that require very few ingredients (all of which the FDA recognizes as generally safe).
In addition, the FDA could regulate e-cigarettes right now as tobacco products, which would automatically ban their sales to minors and address quality control. This is what the federal court and the appeals court have told them to do. Instead, the FDA has chosen to spend millions in taxpayer dollars on litigation against e-cigarette manufacturers to regulate the devices as drugs (thereby giving control and profits to the pharmaceutical industry).
The American Association of Public Health Physicians estimates the risk of electronic cigarettes to be “much less than 1%” of that posed by traditional cigarettes. There’s no smoke, so obviously there’s no secondhand smoke. No tar, no carbon monoxide, no flame, no ash, no butts, no offensive odor, and the levels of tobacco-specific carcinogens are the same as those found in the nicotine patch). It’s about 10 e-cigarette ingredients compared with hundreds to thousands of ingredients in a traditional cigarette.
Clearly, the push to ban the use of e-cigarettes has nothing to do with health. The only thing I can figure out is that these groups are either funded by the pharmaceutical/tobacco industries (neither of which manufactures e-cigarettes), or they’re on some kind of crazy moral crusade because e-cigarettes look too much like smoking for their delicate sensibilities (plus smokers enjoy them, and smokers are supposed to suffer for their sins, I guess).
Crazy stuff!
chris • Feb 18, 2011 at 10:21 am
The FDA doesn’t regulate cigarettes, why e-cigs then….all about the monies and tobacco jobs…..the companies should just put smoke at your own risk….done
david baumgartner • Feb 18, 2011 at 1:14 am
I have tried these cigarettes in an effort to discontinue regular cigarette. They definitely work and very likely when the tests come back; are less carcinogenic than regular cigs. I say either outlaw nicotine or the FDA should leave E-cigs alone.
Jeminy Crickets – enough big brother already
Are you serious? • Feb 17, 2011 at 7:03 pm
The FDA doesn’t think these are safe? Cigarettes aren’t safe, so what do smokers care anyways? The real issue is if the nicotine should leak from the user, like second hand smoke. If their nicotine hit leaks then others who choose not to take nicotine may be affected. The focus should be on prevention of second hand victims.