The Student News Site of Northern Michigan University

The North Wind

The North Wind

The North Wind

Meet the Staff
Ryley Wilcox
Ryley Wilcox
News Editor

I found my passion for journalism during my sophomore year of college, writing articles here and there for the North Wind. Since joining the staff this past semester as the news writer, I have been able...

The North Wind Editorial Sessions
About us

The North Wind is an independent student publication serving the Northern Michigan University community. It is partially funded by the Student Activity Fee. The North Wind digital paper is published daily during the fall and winter semesters except on university holidays and during exam weeks. The North Wind Board of Directors is composed of representatives of the student body, faculty, administration and area media.

TIMES ARE CHANGING — FAFSA announced changes to its filing system in February.
Editorial — The "better" FAFSA
North Wind Editorial BoardFebruary 27, 2024

No point to unclassical liberal studies

During a commencement address delivered for the 1959 honors graduating class at the University of Chicago, American philosopher Leo Strauss congratulated the students on having received a “liberal education.” He defined this liberal education as “an education in or toward a culture.”

For Strauss, ‘liberal education’ involves student engagement with an established canon of literary, philosophical and scientific texts, dating roughly from the epics of Homer to the scientific works of Freud.

According to Strauss’s model of liberal education, students begin with Greek poetry and the Socratic philosophers, discovering the rudiments of poetic expression and the foundations of reason. One continues into Roman and medieval writing, and learns how Vergil and Dante expand upon Homer’s initial vision. This creates knowledge in both the national and the personal epic, and also the expansion of Hellenistic thought into everything from the harshness of Senecan stoicism to the redemptive Christian vision of Augustine. Students further expand the breadth of their reading in literature and philosophy beginning with the Enlightenment and continuing into the middle of the twentieth century.

The liberal studies program at NMU is not an education in culture. It is not cultural at all, but instead “multicultural,” emphasizing the adjective liberal (in the contemporary political sense of the word) over the noun studies. As noted critic Harold Bloom has repeatedly stated, if multiculturalism simply meant substituting Shakespeare for Cervantes (an Anglo-Saxon author of genius for a Latino author of genius), it would be a welcome and refreshing change; but this is never the case.

Story continues below advertisement

Our multicultural liberal studies program allows students to ignore books written by people of genius over two thousand years ago in favor of books written barely two weeks ago by authors who claim to have been repressed, oppressed, or both and so are worthy of our attention. Students are given free reign to take the classes they choose in the order they choose over the course of their academic careers. It is absurd and arrogant to suggest that one’s sense of “freedom” and one’s pursuit “identity” are more valuable academically than a tradition of knowledge descending directly from Plato to Karl Popper.

At a recent meeting with members of the general assembly of ASNMU, President Les Wong spoke at length about something he called “the core of Northern.” He did not mention the liberal studies program, but one gets the sense that reforming it is as far away from his idea of important projects as can be. Many students are glad to remind us that they are here for “training” only, so better yet, instead of fixing the program, let’s cut the petals off the rose and find the core.

Let’s eradicate the liberal studies program altogether. Let future nurses learn nursing and nothing else-what does it matter if they cannot write a simple summary of an article in the New York Times? Let students who think art history is boring elevate their adolescent judgments to the level of outright decisions-if they think YouTube productions are more important than Titian and Rembrandt, just indulge them. After all, it’s only a matter of opinion, and there are no ultimate standards for what is good and valuable according to which ideas and works of art may be judged.

None of this is meant as sarcastic or spiteful; it is better to have no liberal studies program at all than to have a program which does not live up to the name and reputation of liberal education. We must decide: either reform the program in the name of actual liberal studies or throw it out the window and be “trained.”

More to Discover