The U.S. is the wealthiest country in the world, yet it doesn’t provide universal health care or higher education. This is simply not acceptable. Education is a human right. Like health care, someone shouldn’t be denied access simply because they’re not able to afford it.
Student loan debt in the U.S. has just surpassed the absurd amount of consumer credit card debt, with student loan debt recently reaching over $850 billion. The student loan business in America has become just like the credit card business: it is a relationship based on exploitation.
Before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by President Barack Obama, the student loan business was ugly for students, to put it kindly. Most student loans used to originate with a company like Sallie Mae. Sallie Mae would give out loans to students and Uncle Sam guaranteed these loans fully, meaning that if students defaulted, Sallie Mae would still get paid.
If a student defaulted on their loan, the federal government paid Sallie Mae what was owed on the loan and then sent the General Revenue Corporation to collect the payments students owed. The GRC added a 25 percent collection fee onto the student’s loan and the GRC also got a 28 percent commission on what the student paid back on their loan.
There are two problems here. First, this system makes it impossible for students to pay back loans if they fall behind. Second, GRC is owned by Sallie Mae. Why was the government privatizing student loans and sending a corporation owned by Sallie Mae to collect the payments instead of the government doing both directly?
It’s an example of how the government gives special favors and relationships to big corporations.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act stopped the government from backing up Sallie Mae’s student loans. Instead the government gives them directly to the student, which should’ve been done long ago.
This legislation does not go far enough, though. Most countries in Europe provide university-level education tuition-free. Denmark spends 8.5 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on education. Denmark give students free education. In America, this is not the case. The U.S. spends 5.7 percent of GDP on education, but students are still being crushed with debt, and many never even have the chance to go to college.
In the U.S., the federal government finances part of student college expenses if students demonstrate financial need. Even with government help, many still have to take out private student loans, which can end up being expensive. In Europe, the government finances all of student tuition, therefore containing education costs by eliminating private student loans.
Last year, I had financial difficulty paying for college. I have a 3.71 GPA and I have a federal work study job. I almost had to drop out of college last year, even though I was poor and getting grants and scholarships. I was still $6,000 short, with my parents not able to afford the rest of my expenses. I was on the edge of either continuing my pursuit for a law degree or working at my old job back at McDonald’s making minimum wage.
My grandparents stepped in though. They loaned me the money for college, allowing for me to continue my college dreams. Not everyone is as lucky as I am. What would’ve happened if they couldn’t have helped me? I would be flipping burgers instead of writing this column.
Spending 8.5 percent of GDP like Denmark does, instead of 5.7 percent GDP, to provide every American citizen with a tuition-free university education is simply the correct thing to do. Our country has a moral obligation to help its citizens.

























Keri • Oct 6, 2010 at 8:32 pm
I really hate it when people like Jason act like those (myself included) opposed to national healthcare are selfish and “don’t care about the little guy”
You can cite all your “working middle class don’t have access” and “so many with pre-existing conditions are denied” propaganda all day. And while there are plenty of those cases out there, the fact is that most people who oppose socialized medicine, and other forms of government assistance do so becuase they have been out in the real world and have seen the disgusting, rampant abuse of these systems. Lowlife leeches who can afford to drink, smoke, eat Taco Bell every meal, and buy the latest Jordan sneakers need healthcare because they can’t afford their prescriptions. When you give people things for free, they don’t care about it.
It’s not that I don’t care about the little guy. It’s that I don’t care about the lazy guy, and his twelve kids. I’m not going to pay for his healthcare, and his food, and his house. I’m also not going to pay for healthcare for people that I have no control over. Oh, you want me to pay for your triple bypass surgery after you decided to sit on your butt and eat cheetos and cheese burgers for the last 15 years? I don’t think so.
The point is, it’s my money. I worked for it. I will decide how charitable I want to be with it, and who deserves to be the beneficiary of my charity. The government doesn’t need to take my money, and decide who deserves it. I can do a better job of that myself.
Jason • Oct 6, 2010 at 1:28 pm
Choose the Big Mac, and slowly kill yourself, or don’t choose and die quickly! 😀
Jacinto Freeman • Oct 6, 2010 at 11:14 am
Well….. if I was forced at gunpoint to pay for either a delicious Big Mac or this whiney article, guess which one I’d pick.
Jason • Oct 5, 2010 at 10:38 pm
Well, isn’t this just the most ridiculous attempt at disguising a flame war.
If education is not a right, then why do we force children into some form of formal schooling until they are at least 16 years of age? We are demanding their time, and their labor, yet I didn’t see one person crying about slavery of our children in today’s education system.
Ever since the health care bill was even mentioned, Americans have been running in fear, screaming socialist this and socialist that. Are you all so self-centered that you don’t care about the little guy? In what way can socialized medicine, and socialized health care, not benefit the people? Having socialized systems isn’t all that unheard of in America, either. How are our public schools funded? OH MY GOD, I almost forgot, you’re all paying for it with your tax dollars. Let’s all pay for other children to get free education, but forget it if we want to pay a little to ensure they are healthy.
I don’t agree with the content of the article, however. The value of a high school diploma has decreased so much that it’s almost necessary to have some post-secondary degree to get a job above minimum wage. However, if we were to allow all people access to post-secondary educations, those values would depreciate as well. It sucks, but there are ways to make it work for you if you really deserve the education.
Before we even think of trying to socialize post-secondary education, however, we might as well go all the way and get a health care bill that isn’t in favor of big corporations still. I don’t know about you guys, but didn’t anyone see it a little fishy that there was nearly 2,000 pages of political garbage to read through, that left just as many loopholes as before the bill? My 7 year old little brother could get the point across with a couple sentences, and it would work much better than the bill now.
Universal health care:
Everyone gets equal access to health care and medicine. Taxes help pay doctors and hospital bills.
For all you self-righteous, hard-working adults out there, why is it so bad that everyone should get equal health care? You wouldn’t pay as much as an individual for your health care, or for your family’s health care. It would be collective, and everyone would have access to health care, and no one would need to be denied a basic human right because of a “pre-existing condition.” Don’t care enough about humans as a race to consider helping the fellow man out instead of just worrying about you?
Oh wait, don’t forget to tell me that if we get socialized health care then we will become like China. Since we already have socialized public education and socialized transportation services, if we make people pay so that the race as a whole can be more healthy, we will become an evil socialistic China.
The fact of the matter is, socialism is helpful in some cases, like public schools, and the roads you drive on to get to work. Why shouldn’t health care fall into that same category?
Chuck • Oct 5, 2010 at 7:49 pm
Why is education skyrocketing in cost? Because if something is worth $10 it will cost $10. Yet if the government subsidizes 50%, it now costs $15 because the market will correct. It’s the same reason why cheap shit vinyl, ie plastic, windows cost more than higher quality aluminum windows…. the government gave a $1500 tax credit on the plastic ones, so the price went up by…about $1500.
Eric Cartmen • Oct 5, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Are any of these arguments not straight from a Ron Paul or Sharon Angle libertarian note card. Maybe people will take these comments more seriously if they come from people who don’t think the government is an evil entity that wants to murder, rape, and steal from you. Try citing sources that aren’t obviously libertarian like Ludwig von Mises Institute and we may believe you. Only in the UP i guess, eh????
David Singhiser • Oct 5, 2010 at 6:51 pm
I’m so very pleased with the responses to this article.
I suggest Aaron, you learn some real economics at http://mises.org and learn the real nature of government at http://lewrockwell.com. Your whole thesis is based on government and media propaganda.
You don’t have a right to other people’s money, even if they are billionaires. What is immoral and unethical for one person to do is immoral and unethical for the government to do, even if a majority claim that right. This is legal plunder, but plunder nevertheless.
You are correct, however, the student loan programs are a major scam and causing great numbers of people to become debt slaves. It is worse than even credit card debt.
Your idealism is commendable, but dangerous. I hope you don´t lose the idealism, but transfer it to something for more important and fragile to support, Liberty.
A great book to start off with is, “The Law” by Frédéric Bastiat
“The State is the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else.” ~Frédéric Bastiat
“Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.” ~Frédéric Bastiat
Jenn • Oct 5, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Here’s another reason why you should not point to other socialist countries and how education is free and great there:
http://mises.org/daily/4655
The Finnish state is bankrupt. Their subsidized education has actually led to some significant problems, and shortages in professions that are not subsidized.
You want to talk about what’s acceptable? I think your advocacy of theft is unacceptable.
Peter • Oct 5, 2010 at 4:20 pm
Stacy is absolutely right. You do not have the right to somebody else’s labor, which is exactly what you are implying. You may think it is a worthy investment but it most certainly is not a right. You have the right to be left alone free from violence but you don’t have the right to tell your elected officials to use violence on other people.
“Our country has a moral obligation to help its citizens” – that is one of the most ill-informed sentences I have ever read. From a practical standpoint… no, in fact the supreme court has upheld that the police (government agents) don’t even have an obligation to protect individuals from violence, respond to calls or assist people. More importantly, countries do not have moral obligations. You can claim individuals have a moral obligation, I personally reject that but it is at least something that can be debated, but countries are nothing more than a verbal shortcut to identify a group of people in a geographic region. Verbal shortcuts do not have morals.
Even if the people that live in the United States have a moral obligation, that obligation does not mean steal from your neighbors against their will. I am sorry you had some hardships during your time in college but you are not alone. Some of us (like me) worked for four years straight BEFORE college to save up the money needed to attend so that I could avoid debt. I also worked two jobs while in college to take care of my finances. Suck it up. If you are going to pretend to be an adult you should quit acting like a child and take responsibility for yourself. Life is tough, stealing from others to pay for your college and preventing them to pay for their own preferences in life is not the answer.
Jenn • Oct 5, 2010 at 4:12 pm
When you say that something is a “right” you mean that one’s entitled to it. There can be no other meaning. However, if education is a right, it means you are entitled to someone else’s labor. Education necessarily entails the work of teachers, professors, and other people’s time, work and money. To say that one’s entitled to the work, time and money of others is essentially to support slavery. Slavery just means that a person cannot keep a portion, or maybe any, of their wages, or that some or all of their work goes to benefit someone else.
For example, slaves in the South before the civil war, were not allowed to do what they pleased with their own money and labor. Of course, their masters would give some of their earnings back in the form of food, clothing, and other services, but what made them slaves was not necessarily the chains, or the beatings (not all slaves were constantly in chains or beaten). What made them slaves was the fact that because of force, or the threat of force used upon them, they were not allowed to determine what to do with their labor, and the money/fruits of their labor.
Applied to the current situation, your proposition entails slavery of teachers, professors and other educators. Think about it – if one is “entitled” to education, this means that one is entitled to force someone to be a teacher and teach you, even if they don’t want to. This means you have the right to force a professor to teach you for free, because it is a “right.” This simply cannot be the case. For example, what if, in a given community, no one wanted to teach? Would you have a right to put a gun to people’s heads and force them to be teachers? If education is a right, then it should be perfectly acceptable, just, and indeed, moral, to do so.
And if you believe it is moral to do so, then you believe in slavery. You believe that you are entitled to use force or threat of force against a teacher, educator, or professor, to determine how their labor is to be apportioned; this is no different from slavery.
Ken F • Oct 5, 2010 at 4:07 pm
Others have made very poignant statements about the most important consideration – that you – that no one has the right to the fruit of another’s labor.
I will address another problem. Why would you wish to massively decrease the worth of a college education by flooding the market? Even in a perfect world of people who would graduate with an excellent education it would depress the wages of those with bachelor degrees forcing more years of schooling to have an expectation to rise above the average wage. Of course this extra education is time taken away from production. Of course as well this would decrease standards in order for more colleges to gain more taxpayer dollars in order to pump out degrees which would bring the social and economic value of a ba and bs down to the current level of a HS diploma (having itself been watered down through decades of lowering standards).
Congratulations – you’ve just wasted a great deal of money making a college education rather worthless and bringing a college degree to a standard below a HS diploma of the 1950’s.
Conner Drigotas • Oct 5, 2010 at 4:06 pm
The damage that a system like this would cause would be unimaginable. The involvement of government in the day-to -day life of the American citizen i already overstepping its bounds far beyond where it should.
We are a people based on individual rights and a system where those who worked hard and earned their place would benefit.
My money, and the money of your neighbor dosnt belong in your pocket anymore than I deserve a set of your car keys or the ability to take money out of your bank account. In examining your “right” you forget the rights of everyone else.
So many people are asking for bailouts, handouts, healthcare that is controlled by the government. Stop. Think. What are you going to do when there are no more rich to take from? Im a college student too, and you know what? I have a job on campus, I make an effort to benefit my community and I plan ahead. I appreciate your work ethic and I could not be happier that your grandparents were able to help you.
But excuse me if I slap your hand away next time you try to reach those fingers into my wallet.
Stacy Litz • Oct 5, 2010 at 3:44 pm
Wow, I almost vomited after I read this.
I understand your thinking, because you’ve been so indoctrinated by government this and government that. I’m sorry. I am so sorry.
What we need to do is get government OUT of colleges and OUT of healthcare. Prices will go down, competition will happen, and life will be happy.
A right? Dude, wake up. It is not a RIGHT that I PAY for YOUR college. Or you pay for mine. Or Joe Smo to pay for my healthcare bill. Maybe it is a right that no one PREVENT me from getting it, but not a right that it is supplied to me for free. Still, you can’t go about throwing that word around so easily.
Dean Johnson • Oct 4, 2010 at 2:36 pm
How moronic! About as stupid as national health care. Little boy get a job and pay off YOUR own tuition. Or student loans like everyone else. We’ll watch this national healthcare nonsense get repealed any way.
Greg • Oct 3, 2010 at 10:02 pm
Are you aware of the amount of unfunded debt this nation owes in the long term? That is, the amount the government owes for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and all the other entitlements that are now nearly bankrupt. That mid range estimate is $130,000,000,000,000. That’s 130 trillion dollars, an impossible debt to pay .Some estimates put it at 200 trillion. That debt is not defense spending. Its all entitlements. All the money that exists in the entire world is only about 65 trillion. And you want another handout.
The USA is essentially bankrupt yet the government just keeps spending. The government has been doing it for more than 40 years with new entitlements. Obama’s new health care entitlement is estimated to cost up to $2.5 trillion over ten years. Just more for the national debt. We are printing money and borrowing money from foreign countries to pay our bills. The amount of spending far exceeds the amount of taxes the country takes in. So guess what you can expect for your generation – massive tax increases for decades to come to pay off this debt. Be prepared to pay European style taxes in your future – 50 to 70 percent tax rates to pay for your handouts. If you think you will enjoy the prosperity of your parent’s generation, dream on my friend.
Martin • Oct 1, 2010 at 2:10 pm
In America, you do have the right to education, health care, property, and most anything else that does not encroach on the liberty of others. I’m pretty sure there are already laws stopping schools from barring admission because of race, religion, gender, age, and even disability. You have the right to go get these things. No one has any right to be given another person’s property (money) or liberty (service or time).
Just the name of the bill, “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”, should arouse suspicion. What part of that addresses student loans? I stay away from food with misleading labels and false advertising like that. I certainly don’t want to subject my money or health to that kind of misrepresentation.
All of these services come at a cost. Countries like the Netherlands offers “free” tuition. Everyone there knows it isn’t free because their tax rate ranges above 60%. Everyone pays for it, yet I know people who have sought education in the U.S. on top of paying taxes to their national universities.
The other social aspect to consider is the value of things that are “free. We know that people have difficulty attaching a dollar amount to things bought on credit cards. It is much more difficult to hand over the cash. This is how people devalue material items, crave more, and get into debt. We also know the easiest way to save is to take out a few dollars each pay check before you start spending. You never really notice it. The first example is how “free” services that you don’t pay for (up front) foster a “where’s mine” attitude, devalue the services our government provides, and gets us into insurmountable debt. The second example illustrates how the government chips away at your liberty (money=property) with little backlash.
If socialism is what you seek, move to a socialist country. I’m sure China, North Korea, Venezuela, or Cuba would be glad to take in an American immigrant, seeing how many of their citizens are fleeing to the U.S.
Keri • Sep 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm
This is some of the most ridiculous nonsense I’ve ever heard. You should understand very clearly that NOBODY owes you anything. The government doesn’t owe you an education. They don’t owe you health care. There are thousands upon thousand of opportunities for scholarships, grants, and loans. God forbid you actually work hard and sacrifice to see your “college dreams” come true, no, it would be better if someone just gave it to you. You would have had to take some time off to work and save money? Oh no, what a travesty. Working hard and saving money to achieve your goal of a college education? What a ludicrous idea!!
I’m so tired of hearing this “well Europe does it so we should” B.S. America didn’t become the wealthiest, most powerful nation on earth by copying every other nation and their socialist schemes. It was founded on hard work and determination, the little man pulling himself up by the boot straps. Nobody owes you anything, it’s not their “moral responsibility.” If you want something, work hard for it and stop complaining because you think it’s too difficult.
Ryan • Sep 30, 2010 at 11:26 am
I just wanted to address your method of argumentation and not your issue: I can’t count the number of times I have read the argument “The U.S. is the wealthiest country in the world (insert issue) this is not acceptable.” This is simply not an acceptable form of argumentation it is utterly meaningless and only proves to preach and chastise without proving anything. You need to argue why your issue is important, more important than other issues we could spend money on, not simply assume it is and proceed to preach and chastise us. Tell us why we should be upset not just assume we are. You should have spent the article telling us why we should change rather that scold us for not doing so.