The Student News Site of Northern Michigan University

The North Wind

The North Wind

The North Wind

Meet the Staff
Dallas Wiertella
Dallas Wiertella
Multimedia Editor

Through my experience here at the North Wind I have been able to have the privilege of highlighting students through all forms of multimedia journalism. Whether I'm in front or behind the camera, I aim...

The North Wind Editorial Sessions
About us

The North Wind is an independent student publication serving the Northern Michigan University community. It is partially funded by the Student Activity Fee. The North Wind digital paper is published daily during the fall and winter semesters except on university holidays and during exam weeks. The North Wind Board of Directors is composed of representatives of the student body, faculty, administration and area media.

Students protest against Israel-Hamas war with campus encampment
Students protest against Israel-Hamas war with campus encampment
Dallas Wiertella April 30, 2024

Golden Rule forgotten

Guest Column by Brian Westrick

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

The Golden Rule is considered a popular maxim in nearly every culture, religion and people in the world. It notably appears in the Holy Bible, Matthew 7:12. What could be more simple?

We’ve all been taught this rule as far back as kindergarten. It was truly the first rule we were taught when we were children, before we were asked to memorize handbooks, sets of traffic laws, codes of conduct and other restrictions to our own behavior.

Story continues below advertisement

It was simple: if you didn’t want someone to do something to you, don’t do it to someone else.

With Christianity being a cornerstone of the modern Republican Party, and the Golden Rule being a cornerstone of Christianity, why is the Golden Rule not only being forgotten by the Christian Right, but being outright booed in the latest Republican debate?

I felt as though I was finally staring into the great abyss where true American values had finally devolved into a pure bloodlust, based entirely upon American Exceptionalism.

However, the scariest part wasn’t that we were applying the typical version of American Exceptionalism, in which America was not subject to some rules that have ruined nations in the past, but that we were not even required to act in any reasonable fashion, or treat our fellow residents of the world as though they matter.

Ron Paul was booed and hissed in South Carolina. Why?

Perhaps, for attempting to introduce to the bloodthirsty crowd the notion that perhaps if the United States wasn’t so aggressive overseas for economic and political gain, that we would have fewer enemies. Therefore we would keep other nations from wanting to do us harm.

Who can really say what it was that incited the hostile reaction from the crowd?

Whether it was painting America as the aggressors in the conflicts in which we are now involved, which is about as ludicrous as… well, gravity. Or perhaps it was the notion that even if we are the aggressors, it would involve admitting we were wrong in our militaristic pursuits. The latter is more understandable, as admitting fault has never been much of a staple of the GOP.

However, it was not the booing of Ron Paul’s suggestions that realized the true terror that I felt from the debates.

It was combining this observation with Mitt Romney’s reaction to Ron Paul when he said, “The right way, Congressman Paul, in my view, is — to keep us from having to go to those wars is to have a military so strong that no one would ever think of testing it.”

This statement was met with cheers. Not only cheers, but a raucous applause.

Gov. Romney not only advocates, but has also largely campaigned on the idea of intimidating our enemies into leaving us alone: creating a military so terrifying that the rest of the world fears to disagree with what we value politically.

This article opened with The Golden Rule, a phrase which appears within the Holy Bible multiple times, which was booed in the GOP debates. You have just read a quote that was massively applauded. Just as a refresher, I would like you all to acknowledge the definition of terrorism, keeping in mind Mitt Romney’s stance, and the resulting applause.

The definition is: “The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.”

More to Discover