Are the Republicans really the anti-gay, anti-minority, anti-women party?
If you just watch television and browse through Facebook, you probably think they are.
Despite what you may have heard on those various platforms, there’s another side of the story you’re not hearing.
Yes, there is a vocal minority of anti-gay, anti-minority, anti-women bigots who grab hold of national headlines and online media, yet for some reason Republicans are sometimes unable to grab that megaphone back and educate voters about their real poltical views.
Just like how people understand that the Westborough Baptist Church doesn’t represent all Christians, the Grand Old Party (GOP) must get people to understand that the vocal minority doesn’t speak for the rest of them.
If there was a lesson to be learned from the 2012 election, it was this: communication is the key factor in a political campaign. And the Republican party has a huge communication problem based on the previous election’s results.
Mitt Romney lost because he was successfully painted as an evil vulture capitalist who cared little for everyday people — let alone his family dog.
Mitt Romney failed in portraying himself as a tough job creator and a businessman who could use his experience to work across the aisle.
The image and persona the Obama team created around Romney was so infectious and powerful that even as a Republican, I couldn’t resist but listen to David Letterman’s parody video entitled “Mitt Romney Gangnam Style” with glee.
Most of the metrics that political analysts use to determine the outcome pointed toward a Republican victory.
Economic recessions, broad political dissatisfaction, broken policy promises — they all should have culminated to Obama being routed.
The swing voters are apolitical and very moderate; they swing whenever and wherever the economy goes.
But for some reason, they broke tradition and voted for Obama.
The number one reason given why they didn’t jump ship to the Republican column was found in the exit polling: Romney wasn’t relatable enough.
Newsflash — elections aren’t decided by policy.
They are decided on how the ignorant a swing voter “feels” about a candidate.
A party’s image isn’t formed from policy positions, but rather Saturday Night Live skits, Facebook memes and soundbites found on Youtube.
That is the battle that the GOP is losing — not necessarily in ideas but in messaging.
The fact is the conservative narrative can appeal to all Americans of different race, faiths and orientations.
How we’re branding conservatism only appeals to roughly less than half of Americans. You don’t win elections by appealing to less than half of the voters.
GOP leaders not only need to be better Facebook and Twitter users, they need to make a serious outreach effort to the lesbian, gays, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community, Latinos, African Americans and young people.
That means recruiting LGBT conservatives to run for election, as well as penetrating inner-city and local politics.
Once the brand and credibility is built up from the local and state side, the GOP can use this newfound network to neutralize the democratic racial and LGBT advantage.
I’m proud to be part of this Republican revitalization effort. The NMU College Republicans (of which I am chairman) authored a resolution that was passed by the statewide organization of College Republican chapters.
The resolution is very clear: the time to change the tone of GOP messaging is now.
The resolution condemns the recent comments of a GOP leader from Michigan — who linked research on Facebook that made outrageous claims regarding LGBTs.
Republicans need to be aggressively courting these voters, not turning them away by acting like a bigot, so their deplorable statements can be attributed to the GOP.
There are so many Americans who are fiscally conservative and ambiguous or moderate on social issues.
They are scared off by the Democrats’ attacks on Republicans and the crazed remarks of old racists claiming to be a part of the Republican leadership.
These American moderates then hesitantly vote Democrat because at least the Democrats are nice people and seemingly treat everyone with respect.
These Americans should be voting Republican and they would be voting Republican if Republicans changed their tone and their branding.
The path for a Republican revival in 2016 isn’t by changing our policy platform substantially. It’s by changing the perception of who Republicans are.
LGBTs — Republicans want you to join the party.
As the traditional party of civil rights and civil liberties, Republicans will make sure that you are treated equally before the law.
The Republican party is an individualist party.
We believe that your life and your identification aren’t tied to your parent’s wealth, to your race or even to your sexual orientation.
Your identity is yours, and the Republican party and its policy will protect your right to privacy and will treat you as an American and nothing more or less.
As a conservative party, Republicans will keep your taxes low, keep tyrannical government out of your life and will protect you from people who won’t let you live the life you want to live.

























Dan • Apr 29, 2013 at 4:03 pm
The Republican Party is lost in the wilderness and likely finished as a distinctive party from the Democrats. Far too many Republicans are not conservatives which is part contributed the Romney, the Massachusetts liberal Republican losing big. I doubt we will ever see a true conservative Republican win the White House. The only ones who will win will be moderate/liberal Republicans like Crispy Kremes Christie. Hillary will use the same playbook as Obama used in 2012 and win big in 2016. The immigration amnesty will guarantee a Democrat in the White house and a Democratic Congress for decades to come. Say goodnight Republicans. You blew it.
Scared conservative • Apr 26, 2013 at 9:27 am
Every black conservative is castigated by the progressive media.
Every Hispanic conservative is castigated by the progressive media.
Every gay conservative faces two choices: stay in the closet, or come out and face chastisement by the progressive media for being a hypocrite or not coming out sooner.
Successful conservative business men and women are scorned by the progressive media for their investments and how they pay taxes. They are scorned by wealthy media moguls and by politicians who pay the exact same low tax rate and use the exact same investment funds. (see: Debbie Wasserman Schultz-offshore accounts; see: Warren Buffett back taxes)
Why, on April 15, did the progressive media postulate that the suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing might be a white Tea Party supporter? Why, after we knew the suspects were 19-35 year old male Islamic jihadists, did the progressive media rush to the defense of Islamic jihadists, reminding us (correctly) that a very small percentage of Muslims are radical extremists, and that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful? Why do the progressive media attempt to portray the minute minority of Republican politicians with hyperbole views as “main stream”?
Tom Ender • Apr 26, 2013 at 7:47 am
Really, you think the Republican Party is not anti gay? Evidence would support your claim. I think the Republican party is anti gay and will present evidence.
Why did Colorado pass civil unions in 2013 and not 2012? Because the Republicans lost control of the Colorado House, that’s why. A quick research of Colorado civil unions 2012 will show you that the Republican party is more anti gay than gay friendly.
A majority of Republican legislators voted against removing an unconstitutional law from its books, making gay sex a felony. Even though this law is unconstitutional they simply could not get pass their hate and voted to keep it.
I can’t think of anything much more hateful than keeping one’s partner from being with them in the hospital. yet:via a Forbes article from last May Wisconsin GOP Governor Scott Walker
“Walker is literally going out of his way to prevent two people in a loving, committed relationship from visiting one another at the hospital. In other words, at what is quite likely a couple’s darkest hour, Scott Walker wants to impose legal restrictions barring two people from being with one another.
Have you even read your party;s 2012 platform regarding same sex union? Just recently it was reaffirmed unanimously. I trust you know of anti gay Tony Perkins. He takes credit for writing that plank of your platform.
Sorry, it’s NOT a small minority of Republicans that are anti gay. It is a small minority that is gay friendly. Tell me, which red state has any recognition of same sex unions?
I wish you luck in trying to change your party from its anti gay status. But your party is not a party that wants gays to live the lives they want to live. Do you care for gay people or just their votes?