Palestinian leaders have called for the State of Israel to stop constructing settlements in the West Bank, saying that, without a stop to settlements, they will walk away from negotiations with Israeli leaders. Some may think Palestinians are being unreasonable in their demands. The truth is that Palestinians have been conceding to Israeli wishes for decades. In fact, Israel controls over 40 percent of the West Bank, which is illegal under international law. It is time for Israel to accept a peace plan, something that they used to support as early as 1948.
The State of Israel was created in 1948 and was then recognized as a member of the United Nations in 1949. The creation of Israel resulted from a U.N. plan to divide the British Mandate of Palestine into two distinct states. One state would be Arab and one would be Jewish, with Jerusalem being an international city administered by the U.N.
The Arab states rejected the plan to divide Palestine into two different states. They thought Palestine should be one democratic state, not two different distinct states. Israel accepted the two-state solution proposed by the U.N. The Arab states refused to recognize Israel as a state and the result was the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. The result of this war was that Palestine was not recognized as its own state, but Israel was. The state of Jordan annexed the West Bank and East Jerusalem, while Egypt annexed the Gaza Strip.
In 1967, Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships. Israel disliked this and thought this was a clear violation of international law. This, along with Egypt stationing troops in the Sinai Peninsula, caused an Israeli pre-emptive attack. This attack was the official start of the Six-Day War. The result of this war was Israel controlling much more geographical land mass than before the war. Israel annexed the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip from Egypt, east Jerusalem and the West Bank from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria.
On Nov. 22, 1967 the U.N. Security Council unanimously passed U.N. Security Council Resolution 242. This resolution called for the “withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” The resolution simply reinforced the idea that no country can legally take or conquer territory from other countries under Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter.
Israel’s response to Resolution 242 in 1967 contrasts contemporary Israeli political responses concerning current Israeli-occupied territories. Their response stated that “The Government of Israel … assures you of its full co-operation in your efforts with the States concerned to promote agreement and to achieve an accepted settlement for the establishment of a just and lasting peace, in accordance with your mandate under the resolution.”
One thing is simple. Israel was agreeing to leave to areas they annexed during the Six Day War. As soon as Israel would have withdrawn, Syria, Egypt and Jordan would have decided which territories they would keep and which they would give to a future Palestinian state.
We now fast-forward to the present. Israel is still continuing to construct settlements in the West Bank, all of which are considered to be occupied by the U.N. and International Court of Justice. Israel stated they were committed to Resolution 242 in 1967, but building more and more settlements in the West Bank violates the main intent of Resolution 242. Why do they build settlements then?
The sad truth is that the current parliamentary coalition is one of multiple center-right and Orthodox religious parties. Many of these Orthodox parties believe that the border for the state of Israel should be the Jordan River, as implied in their interpretation of the Old Testament. This interpretation is the one that is forced upon the Palestinians, instead of what Israel should be basing their interpretations off of, which is international law.
Israel tries to make it seem that they are a weak country in the Middle East that needs the constant assistance of the U.S to fend off enemies pursing nuclear weapons like Iran. Why should Israel be afraid? Israel has nuclear weapons, although they have never admitted this publicly. In 1975, the Israeli defense minister Shimon Peres was asked by South Africa defense minister PW Botha if Israel would sell the apartheid country nuclear weapons. Peres responded by offering the weapons in three different sizes.
Israel is not a weak country. They have the full backing of the strongest military power in world history with the U.S. behind them. Israel also has high-tech military weapons, including nuclear weapons. The Palestinians deserve a country to call their own. Israel supported a two-state solution over sixty years ago. It is time for Israel to support a two-state solution once again.

























Mia • Apr 16, 2012 at 4:45 pm
Palestine IS’NT a islamic state. There are christians, muslims and even jews that are Palestinian. Palestinians are’nt fighting for it to be an islamic state, their fighting for it to be Palestine again. Jewish was the first religon. Therefore everyone that lived in Palestine were already jewish. As christianity came along some of the jews converted. Then as islam came others converted as well. so does it make sence to kick people out of there country because they converted religons and bring other people who have NOTHING to do with palestine and tell them its their homeland? Jewish is a religon not a race! It’s like saying all christians homeland is Africa.
mate • Apr 2, 2011 at 12:46 pm
isreal dosnt want da peace cause they know`s palestine will be more strong than them cause da palestinian are everywhere palestinian population 20 000 000 but isreal fact population is 3 000 000
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh how they can
usa help them to be and usa send money why american dont use this money for american
i love american people
Martin • Dec 10, 2010 at 8:49 am
Jessica- the “real” facts predate the 2006 elections, and certainly the 1990’s rise of Hamas. Is your stand to defend Hamas?
The terrorist group’s “rightful” claim of political power is on par with Al Qaeda’s takeover of Afghanistan and the opium industry, or Saddam Hussein’s 100% margin of victory in every Iraqi election.
You are correct that strength does not make Hamas a terrorist organization. Tactics do.
Jessica • Dec 8, 2010 at 1:59 pm
You all need to learn the real facts, as opposed to just blindly accepting what your government tells you. Abu Mazen is NOT the rightfully elected leader of anything. Hamas rightfully won the general elections in 2006, and were FORCED out of power by the Fatahs in a political coup. The “Palestinian Authorities” that you refer to are the Fatahs. It was a civil war, in which the FATAHS started the abductions and acts of terror. Just because Hamas was strong enough to respond, doesn’t make them the terrorists. The only reason the U.S. considers them to be terrorists is because they oppose a group that the U.S. backs. But the United States doesn’t have the greatest history in supporting political leaders abroad. So take it with a grain of salt.
P.S. Gil- There is no such thing as a war on terror. It’s an abstract thought, not a solid opposition. And who is or isn’t considered to be terrorists is determined by corrupt governments to begin with.
Gil • Oct 18, 2010 at 12:24 am
its great how you miss lead us, the readers, make it seems like Israel is the one avoiding giving the Palestinians their own country. Perhaps you should explain that the Palestinians are so divided among themselves, with the Hamas not acknowledging Abu Mazen (aka Mahmoud Abbas) as the rightful elected Palestinian President.
How about you would mention the fact that the Hamas, the elected party who control the Gaza Strip is classified as a terror organization by the US, EU, Russia, Turkey, Canada and even the Palestinian authorities themselves.
Your article is misleading and therefor denigrates Israel and its allies to the peach agreement and for the war on terror.
If you don’t know the facts and incapable for unbiased interpretation of currents events just do us all a favor and don’t write about it.
Dean Johnson • Oct 15, 2010 at 2:51 pm
Palestinians have had plenty of opportunities for autonomy. What would be the bedrock of a Palestinian economy? They rely on Israelis for their income. Show me an intelligent Palestinian. Israel land wise is just sliver on coast of the Mediterannean Sea. Tactically they’d have to be crazy to cede any more land to anyone. They are surrounded by people who hate them. It is a shame that every able body that can carry an Uzi is in the IDF, but they have no alternatives.
Like your article on the federal government paying tuition you are way off base. You keep writing your nonsense and there will always be an army of common sense to refute you..
Greg • Oct 14, 2010 at 4:31 pm
Well stated Martin. The day after Israel become a nation, it was attacked by a coalition of Arab states bent on its destruction. It fought two more wars for survival in 1967 and 1973. Everyone needs to remember when Israel gave up the Gaza Strip a few short years ago, Gaza became a terrorist base in short order. Now the lunatics in the Iranian government are openly calling for its destruction.
Martin • Oct 14, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Not to over simplify things, but the Israelites have occupied this region since Moses led them there over 3,000 years ago. There have been conflicts and power shifts on a constant basis, whether it be Roman, Islamic, Arab, Ottoman, Egyptian, or European. The common theme is the oppression of the Jewish people from the Assyrian Empire (720B.C.) through the British mandate. Now, Hamas drives the Palestinian state and occupies the Gaza strip. You are asking Israel to concede territory to a terrorist organization.
Israel is not an innocent victim, but neither are they a great bully. They are a tiny nation with little to no natural resources. They are not weak because if they were, they would immediately cease to exist. Neighboring states have made it clear that they wish to eradicate Israel.
It is difficult to point fingers in a centuries old battle. Western theology aside, here’s the logical crux of the debate: if Israel gets its way, there is no treaty. If the Arabs get their way, there is no Israel. How do you sit down to a discussion with someone who prays for your annihilation?
tim • Oct 14, 2010 at 8:48 am
i dont think that israel is against a two state solution at all. in fact, the alternative is one big country with a palestinian majority. but what israel does object to, is giving up the land, PLUS having millions of palestinians “return” to israel. Yasir arafat was offered virtually all of the west bank, gaza strip, AND part of jerusalem. He turned it down because he wouldn’t give up the right of return. That is the heart of the problem. Israel wants israel to be a jewish state, and not have jews as a minority in their only home. Keep in mind that there are dozens of islamic countries.